3rd Judicial District
Trial Process

Jury Selection | Instructions | Criminal Trial | Civil Trial | Deliberations | Verdict

A trial is a legal forum for resolving individual disputes, and in the case of a criminal charge, it is a means for establishing whether an accused person is legally guilty of an offense. The trial process varies with respect to whether the matter at issue is civil in nature or criminal.

In either case, a jury acts as a fact-finding body for the court in assessing information and evidence that is presented by the respective parties in a case. A judge presides over the court and addresses all the legal issues that arise during the trial. A judge also instructs the jury how to apply the facts to the laws that will govern in a given case.


Jury Selection: The first phase of a jury trial involves the selection of particular jurors- a screening process which is known as "voir dire". In a criminal trial involving a felony offense, 12 jurors and up to six alternate jurors may be chosen; if the charge is a misdemeanor, a jury of six is necessary. In a case involving a civil matter, a jury will comprise of 6 jurors and usually one or two alternates.

In a criminal case, a judge will always be present during jury selection to explain the principles of law, to read the accusatory instruments, and usually to question prospective jurors.

In a civil case, the judge will normally commence the voir dire and generally oversees the selection process. However, the Judge is not required to be present for the entire civil jury selection.

The court and the attorneys for the parties may question the jurors to determine their fitness to serve in a particular case. Such questions are intended to identify whether an individual may have certain bias or personal knowledge that could influence his or her ability to judge a case objectively. While some questions may be personal in nature, they are not intended to embarrass you, even if that becomes the result. They are asked to determine if there is a reason you should not sit on a particular case.

In order to screen out those jurors who they believe would be inappropriate for a particular case, the attorneys have the right to "challenge", or eliminate a prospective juror from serving on the panel, if they offer a justifiable reason why the juror should be eliminated. The process is referred to as a challenge "for cause". There is no limit to the number of times that this challenge may be exercised.

The lawyers also have a fixed number of challenges for which a reason does not have to be given - these challenges are known as a "peremptory". A peremptory challenge is a privilege of trial counsel which may be exercised arbitrarily and without explanation. However, the number of peremptory challenges that may be used is limited by law and varies according to the nature of the case. This challenge may never be exercised in a discriminatory manner.

This questioning process continues until the attorneys for all parties are satisfied with the composition of the jury or have exhausted all challenges permitted by law.

It is necessary to choose additional people who will serve as alternate jurors in the event that an illness or other emergency requires the court to excuse a member of the trial jury. Alternate jurors are necessary to ensure a sufficient number of jurors for deliberations. Throughout the trial, all jurors will sit together and pay careful attention to the evidence. The judge will decide when to excuse the alternate jurors, usually just prior to the deliberations.

back to top


Oath & Preliminary Instructions: Once the screening and selection process results in a sufficient number of jurors and alternate jurors, an oath is administered to the jurors who have been selected. The oath is a pledge that the juror will act fairly and impartially in the role as a judge of all questions of fact. This oath obligates the juror to put aside individual emotions or opinions and to use logic and objectivity throughout the trial and the deliberations.

Following the oath, the judge will provide preliminary instructions which set out the basic responsibilities that jurors must adhere to throughout the trial. These directives include an admonition not to read or listen to news accounts of the trial, visit the scene of an alleged offense, or discuss the case with outsiders or with fellow jurors.

back to top



Criminal Trial
: A criminal trial is a process for establishing whether an individual is legally guilty of a criminal offense. If a trial results in a guilty verdict for a felony offense charge, the possible punishment may include imprisonment of more than one year and in certain extremely serious cases may range in severity to include the death sentence where a defendant is convicted of murder. A trial may also be held on the basis of a misdemeanor offense charge, which covers acts for which the maximum punishment allowed by law is no more than one year imprisonment, probation, or a fine.

  • Opening Statements- After the judge delivers the preliminary instructions, the assistant district attorney (prosecutor) will make an opening address to the jury outlining the charges and the evidence that will be offered to sustain the case. It is important to note that a criminal charge is only an accusation; the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty always rest with the prosecution. The attorney for the defendant is also allowed to make an opening statement but there is no obligation to do so. The defendant may choose not to speak in his or her defense at all.
  • People's Direct- At this point in the trial, the prosecution will present its proof. Because the prosecutor represents the people of the State of New York, this phase of the trial is often referred to as the "People's Direct". Proof may be offered in the form of the testimony of witnesses and the introduction of physical objects or records.
  • Redirect- Following questioning by the prosecutor, the defense attorney may cross-examine the witnesses by asking his or her own questions. The prosecutor may then wish to ask clarifying questions on "redirect" examination. This process continues until all the witnesses for the prosecution have testified.
  • Defense Case- The defense case may involve many witnesses, possibly the defendant, or there may be no witnesses at all. This phase of the trial may also involve a sequence of questioning by the defense counsel and the prosecutor. When the defense has completed the presentation of its witnesses and the questioning is exhausted, the defense will rest its case.
  • Rebuttal- The prosecutor may have a rebuttal case if a specific defense is raised. The prosecutor cannot, however, save evidence from his or her direct case for rebuttal. The defense counsel may cross examine rebuttal witnesses. The People will then rest their case.
  • Summation- The defense attorney will generally deliver a summation argument and may attack the testimony or credibility of witnesses or the prosecutor's evidence or lack of evidence. The prosecutor's summation offers reasons why the evidence shows that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Jury Instructions- At the conclusion of the summation arguments, the judge will charge the jury, or describe to the jury the law that is applicable and the elements of the crime charged. The judge also will explain legal concepts such as the "presumption of innocence", "burden of proof", and "beyond a reasonable doubt". After the judge gives these instructions, the prosecutor and the defense attorney may ask for additional instructions or they may object to those that were given.

back to top


Civil Trial: A civil trial is conducted as a way to enforce or protect private rights. A civil case may be disposed of through a variety of means, including a jury trial. There are several outcomes that may be reached through a civil trial. A trial court may reach a verdict and impose monetary damages on a party to compensate for loss and, on occasion, punish a party for wrongdoing.

In civil cases, the party who brought the case to court is called the plaintiff; the party being sued is called the defendant.
  • Opening Statements- Similar to a criminal trial, a civil trial commences with the delivery of opening statements by the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant, in which they explain their client's position and outline the evidence that they expect to present to support their claims and defenses. These statements are not evidence and should not be considered as such.
  • Plaintiff's Case- After the opening statements, the plaintiff may call witnesses and introduce evidence. The plaintiff's attorney will question each witness, and the defense attorney may cross-examine the witnesses. After cross-examination, the plaintiff's attorney may re-examine some of the witnesses. After completion of this process, the attorney for the plaintiff will tell the judge that the plaintiff rests his or her case. At this point, the judge may excuse the jury and entertain motions from the attorneys.
  • Defendant's Case- The defendant then has the right to call witnesses and to present evidence to support its contentions. A similar sequence of direct questions and cross examination which was conducted during the plaintiff's case will generally occur. The defendant's attorney will question the witnesses, and the plaintiff has the right to cross-examine them. Once this process is completed, the defense will rest its case, at which time the plaintiff may be permitted to offer testimony to reply to or rebut any new matter raised by the witnesses for the defense.
  • After the defense concludes, or rests its case, the attorneys are entitled to make closing statements, which describe what the lawyers assert the evidence proves and why their client should win.
  • Jury instructions- At this point in the proceedings, the judge gives instructions to the jury by identifying the issues to consider and the laws that are applicable to the case. The jury is also informed about the possible verdicts that may be reached, and that the verdict may be based upon a "preponderance of credible evidence".

back to top


Jury Deliberations: After the judge has completed delivering the instructions to the jury, the jurors will leave the courtroom and go to a jury room to begin deliberations- the process that the jury must engage in to arrive at a verdict. Should any questions or personal needs arise during this time, a court officer is nearby to provide assistance.

Each jury has a designated foreperson. The foreperson has the ceremonial duty of acting as the jury's spokesperson. A foreperson has the same status as any other juror and is not required to serve as a moderator during deliberations. In criminal trials, the first juror drawn and accepted by both sides is usually designated by the court as the foreperson. In civil trials, this is customarily the same, or the jury may elect one of its members as foreperson.

The jury reviews the evidence which was presented in a case and discusses the jurors' views on the information.

During the deliberations, jurors should keep an open mind, listen carefully to everyone and be prepared to tell the others what they think and why. It is generally easier to reach a swift and sound verdict when jurors remain courteous to and patient with one another and listen openly to the views of others.

It is important to remember that if questions arise during deliberations, or there is a need for further instructions or a need to have testimony re-read, the foreperson may send a written request to the judge through the court officer. Upon the judge's approval, all parties may be asked to return to the courtroom to address an issue.

back to top


Verdict: In a criminal case, the deliberations must result in a jury's finding by a unanimous vote that the defendant is guilty or not guilty. If a jury reaches a guilty verdict in a criminal case, the judge will determine the punishment or sentence in accordance with the law.

Unlike criminal cases, in civil trials a verdict does not have to be unanimous; agreement by either five or six jurors is sufficient. In addition to deciding upon a verdict, a civil trial jury may also be asked to determine whether there should be an award of damages for certain parties, and if so, how much money should be awarded.

Once the jury has reached its verdict, the foreperson should notify the attending court officer. The officer will advise the judge who will then call everyone, including the jury, back into the courtroom. When everyone is present, the clerk will ask the foreperson for the jury's verdict. In some cases, the entire jury may be "polled" -each member will be asked if he or she agrees with the verdict.

After a guilty verdict, the sentencing normally takes place several weeks after the verdict is rendered. In all cases (except murder cases in which the people are seeking the death penalty) the judge determines when the defendant's sentence will be. Jurors are not required to return to the court for the sentencing proceeding.

back to top

Supreme | County | Surrogate's | Family | City | Specialty | Jury |


©2005 - All Rights Reserved.
New York State Unified Court System Lady Justice
Home
Courts
Litigants
Attorneys
Jurors
Judges
Careers
Search