|
Votes Cast for Constitutional Conventions and Amendments
|
Nov. 7, 1876
|
For amendment of article 5 section 3
|
533,151
|
|
|
Against
|
81,832
|
|
Nov. 7, 1876
|
For amendment of article 5 section 4
|
530,226
|
|
|
Against
|
80,358
|
|
Nov. 4, 1879
|
For amendment of article 6 section 6
|
95,331
|
|
|
Against
|
25,578
|
|
Nov. 2, 1880
|
For amendment of article 6 sections 12 and 13
|
221,903
|
|
|
Against
|
111,225
|
|
[1]Nov. 7, 1882
|
For amendment of article 7 section 3
|
486,105
|
|
|
Against
|
163,151
|
|
Nov. 7, 1882
|
For amendment of article 6
|
248,784
|
|
|
Against
|
75,644
|
|
Nov. 4, 1884
|
For amendment of article 8 section 11
|
499,661
|
|
|
Against
|
9,661
|
|
Nov. 2, 1886
|
For a convention to revise the Constitution and amend the same
|
574,993[2]
|
|
|
Against
|
30,766[3]
|
|
Nov. 6, 1888
|
For the proposed amendment to section 6 article 6
|
498,114[4]
|
|
|
Against
|
55,822[5]
|
|
Nov. 8, 1892
|
For the proposed amendment to section 10 article 3 (relating to
the powers of the two houses of the legislature)
|
174,678
|
|
|
Against
|
180,030
|
|
Nov. 8, 1892
|
For the proposed amendment to article 6 (relating to election of
additional justices of the supreme court)
|
161,759
|
|
|
Against
|
198,110
|
|
Nov. 8, 1892
|
For the proposed amendment to section 7, article 7 (relating to
Onondaga Salt Springs)
|
170,765
|
|
|
Against
|
171,442
|
|
Nov. 6, 1894
|
For the revised Constitution
|
410,697
|
|
|
Against
|
327,402
|
|
Nov. 6, 1894
|
For legislative apportionment
|
404,335
|
|
|
Against
|
350,625
|
|
Nov. 6, 1894
|
For canal improvements
|
442,998
|
|
|
Against
|
327,645
|
|
Nov. 6, 1894
|
For county judges and court of sessions in the county of Kings
|
391,350
|
|
|
Against
|
332,505
|
|
Nov. 6, 1894
|
For additional justices of the supreme court
|
395,233
|
|
|
Against
|
341,713
|
|
Nov. 3, 1896
|
For the proposed amendment to section 7, article 7 (relating to
the forest preserve)
|
321,486
|
|
|
Against
|
710,505
|
|
Nov. 7, 1899
|
For amendment to section 26, article 3 (boards of supervisors)
|
325,182
|
|
|
Against
|
144,667
|
|
Nov. 7, 1899
|
For amendment to section 2, article 6 (temporary designation of
justices to appellate division)
|
283,880
|
|
|
Against
|
137,408
|
|
Nov. 7 , 1899
|
For amendment to section 7 , article 6 (court of appeals)
|
279,469
|
|
|
Against
|
132,064
|
|
Nov. 7, 1899
|
For amendment to section 10, article 8 (limitation of
indebtedness)
|
315,475
|
|
|
Against
|
145,450
|
|
Nov. 5, 1901
|
For amendment to section 18, article 3
|
354,881
|
|
|
Against
|
309,245
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For amendment to section 10, article 8 (limitation of
indebtedness)
|
363,117
|
|
|
Against
|
129,424
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For section 11, article 7 (new section) (payment of state debts)
|
307,768
|
|
|
Against
|
134,773
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For amendment to section 1, article 6 (supreme court judicial
districts)
|
297,893
|
|
|
Against
|
133,999
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For amendment to section 1 , article 12 (organization of cities)
|
338,570
|
|
|
Against
|
133,606
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For section 12, article 7 (new section) (highway improvement)
|
383,188
|
|
|
Against
|
117,181
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For amendment to section 4, article 7 (debt limitations)
|
293,552
|
|
|
Against
|
127,364
|
|
Nov. 7, 1905
|
For amendment to section 2, article 6 (justices, appellate
division)
|
288,227
|
|
|
Against
|
125,649
|
| FOOTNOTES
Footnote 1: Vol. 1 (pp. and 322) and Vol II (pp. and 646) of Lincoln's Constitutional History of New York make mention of two additional amendments voted ypon in 1882, one providing for deficiency in canal revenues and one prohibiting the disposition of Black River canal.
Footnote 2: Including 218,376 informal votes.
Footnote 3: Including 187,418 informal votes.
Footnote 4: Including 3,735 informal votes.
Footnote 5: Including 5,679 informal votes.
|
|