"There shall be a Court of Appeals..."
(Click Here to view entire document in PDF format)



   from the Civil List, 1889
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM of the State of New York is the growth of the soil. It differs fundamentally, alike in spirit and form, from the older systems of England and the Continent. That subtle spirit which is the genius and organic principle of institutions is in this commonwealth thoroughly radical; but in its manifestation and working it has always been constructive and progressive, rather than destructive or wayward. The genius of the commonwealth required an independent judiciary, responsible directly to the people; but the conservatism of growth which is as intuitive with us as is our radicalism of ideas, induced a very cautious progress in the practical application of the principle. The germ gradually and systematically unfolded the outward organism, until today the judicial system of New York, in its structure and its character, is held in high regard alike in Europe and in this country. This system, however, was a growth and not a mechanical device.
     Originally, the law-enacting and law-interpreting as well as law-enforcing functions centered in the Governor. No act of the Legislature could become a law without his assent; he was the Chief Judge of the Court of Final Resort, and his associates of the Council were practically his subordinates; and he was the Chief Executive of English statutes and Colonial enactments. He was the representative of Royal authority and Parliamentary will. With this limitation, he contended for his prerogative as law-giver, judge and executor; councils, courts and administrative officers being but his agents, advisors
and aids, Assemblies being but an orderly method of making known the wishes of the people, and Legislatures only joint committees to prepare bills subject to his approval and the approval of the Crown. The first State Constitution took the supreme judicial function away from him, and vested it in the Lieutenant-Governor and Senate, the Chancellor and Justices of the Supreme Court. The former, under the Colonial government, had frequently been the Chief Justice, who was almost uniformly a friend of the legal rights of the people, as construed by the Whigs of England; and the Senate was the legitmate successor of the Council. The Lieutenant-Governor and Senate were elective officers, and the judicial officers were appointed; thus uniting popular control with conser vative stability. The Constitution of 1846 divided the Court, constituting a Court of Impeachments and a Court of Errors, the latter now becoming a purely Judicial body. This differentiation and development grew inevitably as any thing in nature. The Court of Appeals, as at first constituted, was [par- tially] composed of Judges selected from the Justices of the Supreme Court; but this in time was found to be cumbrous, the business of the Courts having increased to an extent to seriously interfere with the proper discharge of conflicting duties. The natural outgrowth of this state of affairs was the present Court of Appeals, with the intermediate General Term. Thus, while the system has changed, the changes have only been in the direction of a systematic unfolding of the original germ, adapting itself to the general life and order of the commonwealth.



E-Mail the Historical Society

The Historical Society of the Courts of the State of New York
140 Grand Street, Suite 701
White Plains, N.Y. 10601
phone: (914) 824-5717