October 11, 2017
This responds to your inquiry (17-113) asking whether you may continue to serve as an acting village justice if your spouse is elected to serve as a village trustee.
A judge must always avoid even the appearance of impropriety (see 22 NYCRR 100.2) and act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the judiciary’s integrity and impartiality (see 22 NYCRR 100.2[A]). Further, a judge must disqualify him/herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s spouse is a trustee of a party (see 22 NYCRR 100.3[E][d][ii]). Therefore, you will be disqualified in all cases involving the village as a party, but the disqualification is subject to remittal provided that no party is appearing without counsel.
As a reminder, remittal is a three-step process. First, the judge must fully disclose the basis for disqualification on the record. Second, without the judge’s participation, the parties who have appeared and not defaulted and their lawyers must all agree the judge may preside. Third, the judge must independently conclude he/she can be impartial and be willing to preside in the case. If all three steps are satisfied, the judge may accept remittal of his/her disqualification and must incorporate the parties’ and their attorneys’ agreement in the record of the proceeding (see e.g. Opinion 15-82; 22 NYCRR 100.3[F]).
Enclosed, for your convenience, are Opinions 16-144; 16-66; 15-82 and 94-101 which address this issue.
Very truly yours,
George D. Marlow, Assoc. Justice
Appellate Div., First Dep’t (Ret.)
Hon. Margaret T. Walsh
Family Court Judge
Acting Justice, Supreme Court