Newton v Nutty Irishman
2007 NY Slip Op 02092 [38 AD3d 630]
March 13, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007


Brad Newton, Respondent,
v
The Nutty Irishman, Appellant.

[*1] Long, Tuminello, Besso, Seligman & Werner, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Michelle Aulivola and David H. Besso of counsel), for appellant.

Mulholland, Minion & Roe, Williston Park, N.Y. (John A. Beyrer of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for assault, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated April 6, 2006, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against it upon its failure to answer the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To successfully oppose the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against it based on its failure to answer, the defendant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense (see Platinum RX, LLC v Pose, 31 AD3d 522 [2006]; Thompson v Steuben Realty Corp., 18 AD3d 864, 864-865 [2005]). The defendant failed to present a reasonable excuse for its delay in answering after its insurance company disclaimed coverage by letter dated October 4, 2005 (see Thompson v Steuben Realty Corp., supra at 865). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion. Crane, J.P., Santucci, Florio, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.