| Matter of Mirman; Grievance Committee for the Second |
| Motion No: 1990-10092 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 60553(U) |
| Decided on January 11, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34436
K/nal
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
FRED T. SANTUCCI, JJ.
|
1990-10092
In the Matter of Paul S. Mirman, admitted as Paul Mirman, a disbarred attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 1388008)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION FOR REINSTATEMENT |
Motion by the respondent for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division in the Second Judicial Department on March 19, 1969, under the name Paul Mirman. By opinion and order of this court dated May 20, 1991, he was disbarred based on eight charges of neglecting personal injury matters entrusted to him. By decisions and orders on motions of this court dated February 26, 1992, and November 30, 1994, respectively, his motions for reargument and/or renewal of the order of disbarment were denied. His first application for reinstatement was denied by decision and order on application of this court dated March 15, 1999. By decision and order on application of this court dated April 3, 2003, the respondent's second application for reinstatement was denied. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 8, 2005, the respondent's third application for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on his current fitness to be attorney, including obtaining proof of the his satisfaction of the claims which gave rise to the charges against him and the Committee on Character and Fitness was directed to arrange for the expeditious examination of the respondent by a qualified medical expert to determine whether he is incapacitated from continuing to practice law.
Upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that, effective immediately, the respondent Paul S. Mirman, admitted as Paul Mirman, is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law and the Clerk of the court is directed to restore the name of Paul S. Mirman, admitted as Paul Mirman, to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and SANTUCCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court