| Matter of Cobourne v James |
| Motion No: 2005-05688 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 60755(U) |
| Decided on January 17, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M34897
C/sl
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON, JJ.
|
2005-05688 In the Matter of Lorece Cobourne, respondent- appellant, v Naphtalie James, appellant-respondent. (Docket No. V-17323-01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant-respondent on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 23, 2005, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal and for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is referred to the Clerk of the court pursuant to the rules of this court for the issuance of a scheduling order (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116).
CRANE, J.P., KRAUSMAN, RIVERA and DILLON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court