| Matter of Paulino v Camacho |
| Motion No: 2005-10316 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 62909(U) |
| Decided on February 10, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M35999
C/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
REINALDO E. RIVERA
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2005-10316
In the Matter of Carmen Paulino, appellant, v Jose Camacho, respondent. (Docket No. F-4287-01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion by Counsel to be Relieved of Assignment - Family Court |
Motion by counsel assigned to represent the respondent in a proceeding before the Family Court, Kings County, to be relieved, for the assignment of new counsel to defend an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 12, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition to or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to relieve counsel is granted and counsel assigned by the Family Court is relieved from representing the respondent on the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that counsel shall serve a copy of this decision and order upon the respondent on or before February 28, 2006, by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c) and shall file proof of such service with this court; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which seek assignment of new counsel to represent the respondent on the appeal is denied with leave to the respondent to renew, on or before March 14, 2006, upon the submission of proper papers establishing that he is entitled to poor person relief and indicating that the respondent is interested in defending the appeal.
SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, RIVERA and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court