| Matter of Serkez v Serkez |
| Motion No: 2005-11032 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 64783(U) |
| Decided on March 8, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M36811
M/nal
DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
MARK C. DILLON, JJ.
|
2005-11032
In the Matter of Bruce Serkez, respondent, v Rivka Serkez, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-2992-04, V-2993-04, V-2994-04, O-2134-04, O-02994-04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Rivka Serkez from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated November 3, 2005. By order to show cause dated February 1, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated December 19, 2005, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 17, 2006.
RITTER, J.P., SPOLZINO, LIFSON and DILLON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court