Matter of Mooney v Ferone
Motion No: 2005-11569
Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 64938(U)
Decided on March 10, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M36964

M/nal

2005-11569

In the Matter of James Mooney, appellant-respondent,

v Cheryl Ferone, respondent-appellant.

(Docket Nos. V-2264/04, V-2271/04,

V-4235/04, V-4432/04)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated November 7, 2005. By scheduling order dated January 23, 2006, the appellant or cross appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal and cross appeal; or

(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or

(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or

(4) if either the appellant or the cross appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal or cross appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or

(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal and cross appeal.

The appellant and cross appellant have failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is

ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal and cross appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated January 23, 2006, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before March 31, 2006; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court