| Matter of Romero v Tanenbaum |
| Motion No: 2005-11487 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 65059(U) |
| Decided on March 14, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M37086
M/nal
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
STEPHEN G. CRANE
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2005-11487
In the Matter of Mariajose Romero, respondent, v Jacob Tanenbaum, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-00470-04, V-00471-04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Jacob Tanenbaum from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated September 30, 2005. By order to show cause dated February 10, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 4, 2006, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2). Application by the appellant to withdraw the appeal.
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
MILLER, J.P., CRANE, GOLDSTEIN and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court