| Rose v Rose |
| Motion No: 2005-06508 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 67410(U) |
| Decided on April 25, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M38895
E/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-06508 Anthony Rose, respondent, v Pamela Rose, appellant. (Index No. 43629/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 28, 2005, for leave to reargue those branches of her prior motion which were for free transcripts and for the assignment of counsel, which were denied by decision and order on motion of this court dated October 19, 2005, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to reargue is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing her brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 23, 2006; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, SANTUCCI and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court