| Matter of McFarlane v McFarlane |
| Motion No: 2006-01943 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 69030(U) |
| Decided on May 19, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M39730
M/nal
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
|
2006-01943
In the Matter of LaTania McFarlane, appellant, v Bryan S. McFarlane, respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Bryan S. McFarlane, respondent, v LaTania McFarlane, appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. V-1696-02, V-1970-02, V-3398-99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by LaTania McFarlane from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 9, 2006. By order to show cause dated April 13, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated March 10, 2006, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2). The appellant received the transcripts on or about April 7, 2006.
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 19, 2006.
SCHMIDT, J.P., SANTUCCI, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court