| Matter of O. (Anonymous), Brandon; Miracle Makers, Inc. |
| Motion No: 2006-00328 +2 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 70280(U) |
| Decided on June 13, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M40623
M/nal
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
|
2006-00328, 2006-00330, 2006-00331
In the Matter of Brandon O. (Anonymous). Miracle Makers, Inc., et al., respondents; Jonette R. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Brandi O. (Anonymous). Miracle Makers, Inc., et al., respondents; Jonette R. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Morgan R. (Anonymous). Miracle Makers, Inc., et al., respondents; Jonette R. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3) (Docket Nos. B-25122/00, B-25123/00, B-25124/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeals by Jonette R. from three orders of the Family Court, Kings County, all entered December 2, 2005. By order to show cause dated April 11, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 30, 2006, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2). Application by the appellant, inter alia, to relieve assigned counsel and for leave to prosecute the above-entitled appeals as a poor person.
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause and the application, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is to relieve assigned counsel and for leave to prosecute the above-entitled appeals as a poor person is denied with leave to renew, on or before June 30, 2006, on proper papers, including a financial affidavit and an affidavit of the appellant indicating that the appellant is interested in prosecuting the above-entitled appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that the application is otherwise denied.
SCHMIDT, J.P., SANTUCCI, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court