| Matter of Friedman v Naber |
| Motion No: 2006-01582 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 70427(U) |
| Decided on June 15, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M40875
M/nal
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2006-01582
In the Matter of Marie Friedman, appellant, v Harold A. Naber, respondent. (Docket No. F-19407-05)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Marie Friedman from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 6, 2006. By order to show cause dated May 24, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated April 11, 2006, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated April 11, 2006, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
FLORIO, J.P., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court