| Matter of Peconic Baykeeper, Inc. v Suffolk County |
| Motion No: 2005-04822 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 70623(U) |
| Decided on June 20, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M41001
O/nl
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
|
2005-04822 In the Matter of Peconic Baykeeper, Inc., et al., respondents-appellants, v Suffolk County, et al, appellants-respondents, et al., respondents. (Index No. 00262/05)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants-respondents to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 2, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellants-respondents' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until July 17, 2006, and the joint record or appendix on appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellants-respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further;
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief, including their points of argument on the appeal, in accordance with the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
SCHMIDT, J.P., SANTUCCI, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court