| McSorley v McSorley |
| Motion No: 2006-04902 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 75063(U) |
| Decided on September 7, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M44021
Y/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
|
2006-04902 June McSorley, appellant, v Douglas McSorley, respondent. (Index No. 1146/92)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 22, 2006, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to proceed on the original papers is granted, the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for free transcripts, to waive the filing fee, and for the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing her brief on the appeal is enlarged until November 6, 2006; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court