Matter of A. (Anonymous), Elizabeth; St. Vincent's Se
Motion No: 2005-11006 +5
Slip Opinion No: 2006 NYSlipOp 80810(U)
Decided on November 29, 2006
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M47105

M/mv

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P.

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

ROBERT J. LUNN

JOSEPH COVELLO, JJ.

2005-11006, 2005-11008, 2005-11009,

2005-11010, 2005-11011, 2005-11013

In the Matter of Elizabeth A. (Anonymous).

St. Vincent's Services, Inc., et al., petitioners-

respondents; Evelyne T. R. (Anonymous),

appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Victor T. (Anonymous).

St. Vincent's Services, Inc., et al., petitioners-

respondents; Evelyne T. R. (Anonymous),

appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 2)

In the Matter of Esther T. (Anonymous).

St. Vincent's Services, Inc., et al., petitioners-

respondents; Evelyne T. R. (Anonymous),

appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 3)

In the Matter of Paul T. (Anonymous).

St. Vincent's Services, Inc., et al., petitioners-

respondents; Evelyne T. R. (Anonymous),

appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 4)

In the Matter of Mirlaine T. (Anonymous).

St. Vincent's Services, Inc., et al., petitioners-

respondents; Evelyne T. R. (Anonymous),

appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 5)

In the Matter of Christian T., a/k/a

Christin T. (Anonymous).

St. Vincent's Services, Inc., et al., petitioners-

respondents; Evelyne T. R. (Anonymous),

appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 6)

(Docket Nos. B-26285/02, B-26286/02, B-26287/02,

B-26288/02, B-26289/02, B-11037/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeals by Evelyne T. R. from six orders of the Family Court, Kings County, all dated August 17, 2005 (one in each proceeding). By order to show cause dated October 11, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings as abandoned.

Now on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUNN and COVELLO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court