Michelle Laventure & Michael Laventure v Scott A. Rosenberg & Heller & Rosenberg, P.C. Martin Katzman

Michelle Laventure & Michael Laventure v Scott A. Rosenberg & Heller & Rosenberg, P.C. Martin Katzman

Motion No: 2006-01021 NC

Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 61046(U)

Decided on January 9, 2007

Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT : RUDOLPH, P.J., McCABE and LIPPMAN, JJ.

NO. 2006-1021 N CNO. 2006-1323 N C

MICHELLE LAVENTURE and MICHAEL LAVENTURE,

Respondents,

-against-

SCOTT A. ROSENBERG and HELLER & ROSENBERG, P.C.
MARTIN KATZMAN,

Defendants,
-and-

ELIZABETH RYAN, HIRSCH & KALLMAN, P.C.,
STANLEY HIRSCH & MARC KALLMAN,
Appellants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
MICHELLE LAVENTURE and MICHAEL LAVENTURE,

Respondents,

-against-

SCOTT A. ROSENBERG and HELLER & ROSENBERG, P.C.,
ELIZABETH RYAN, HIRSCH & KALLMAN, P.C.,
STANLEY HIRSCH & MARC KALLMAN,
Defendants,
-and-

MARTIN KATZMAN,

Appellant.

DECISION

Motion by appellant Katzman to consolidate appeals numbered 2006-1021 N C and 2006-1323 N C is denied without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers.

Absent is a sworn, notarized affidavit by movant in support of the motion. An attorney who is a party to an action does not enjoy the privilege of utilizing an affirmation (see CPLR 2106).