| Matter of Nazinitsky v Piernick |
| Motion No: 2006-10511 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 61685(U) |
| Decided on January 23, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M49628
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
MARK C. DILLON
WILLIAM E. McCARTHY, JJ.
|
2006-10511 In the Matter of Roy Nazinitsky, appellant, v Ellen Piernick, respondent.
(Docket No. F-6044-02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated September 28, 2006, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to waive the filing fee.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for a free transcript, waiver of the filing fee, and the assignment of counsel are denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to proceed on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116).
PRUDENTI, P.J., KRAUSMAN, DILLON, and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court