| Gulati v Gulati |
| Motion No: 2006-05958 +2 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 66761(U) |
| Decided on April 3, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M52897
E/sl
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
EDWARD D. CARNI, JJ.
|
2006-05958, 2007-01833, 2007-02429 Shikha Gulati, appellant, v Dinesh Gulati, respondent. (Index No. 7051-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 17, 2006 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2006-05958), and two orders of the same court dated November 27, 2006 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-01833), and February 22, 2007 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-02429), to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals from the judgment and the order dated November 27, 2006, and to consolidate the three appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appeal from the order dated February 22, 2007 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-02429), is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeal from the order dated February 22, 2007, with the remaining appeals is denied as academic; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is granted, the appellant's time to perfect that appeal is enlarged until May 21, 2007, and the record or appendix on that appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated November 27, 2006, is denied as premature; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals from the judgment and the order dated November 27, 2006, is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]).
MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, DILLON and CARNI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court