| Matter of Marr v Perfall |
| Motion No: 2007-00075 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 67780(U) |
| Decided on April 19, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M53503
M/mv
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P.
STEVEN W. FISHER
ROBERT A. LIFSON
RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.
|
2007-00075
In the Matter of Thomas Marr, appellant, v Olympe Perfall, respondent. (Docket No. F-02360-01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Thomas Marr from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 13, 2006. By order to show cause dated March 14, 2007, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 23, 2007, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to comply with the scheduling order dated January 23, 2007, is enlarged until May 14, 2007.
KRAUSMAN, J.P., FISHER, LIFSON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court