| Matter of Nazinitsky v Piernick |
| Motion No: 2006-10511 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 67783(U) |
| Decided on April 19, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M53515
M/mv
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
MARK C. DILLON
JOSEPH COVELLO, JJ.
|
2006-10511
In the Matter of Roy Nazinitsky, appellant, v Ellen Piernick, respondent. (Docket No. F-6044-02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Roy Nazinitsky from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated September 28, 2006. By order to show cause dated March 14, 2007, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 30, 2007, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now on the court's own motion, and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 30, 2007, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, DILLON and COVELLO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court