| Holmes v Incorporated Village of Piermont |
| Motion No: 2006-09350 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 76583(U) |
| Decided on August 29, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M59050
E/cb
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
MARK C. DILLON, JJ.
|
2006-09350, 2007-02680
Raymond Holmes, Sr., et al., appellants, v Incorporated Village of Piermont, et al., respondents. (Index No. 00-3089)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Separate motions by the respondent Incorporated Village of Piermont and the respondent Town of Orangetown on appeals from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered August 31, 2006, and September 7, 2006, respectively, to strike the appellants' appendix as inadequate.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motions are granted and the appellants' appendix is stricken; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appellants' brief is stricken for failure to file a brief that complies with the rules of the court (see 22 NYCRR 670.10.3[g][2][iv]); and it is further,
ORDERED that on or before September 28, 2007, the appellants shall serve and file a replacement appendix and brief that complies with the rules of the court (see 22 NYCRR 670.10.3 et seq.) and which contains the motion papers submitted by the parties that resulted in the judgments entered August 31, 2006, and September 7, 2006.
MILLER, J.P., SANTUCCI, FLORIO and DILLON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court