| Coque v Wildflower Estates Developers, Inc. |
| Motion No: 2007-00680 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 77586(U) |
| Decided on September 11, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M59448
E/sl
|
2007-00680, 2007-01802
Luis Coque, appellant-respondent, v Wildflower Estates Developers, Inc., et al., respondents-appellants. (and third-party actions). (Appeal No. 1) Luis Coque, plaintiff-respondent, v Wildflower Estates Developers, Inc., defendant-respondent, Classic Construction, appellant. (and third-party actions). (Appeal No. 2) (Index No. 18365/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by Classic Construction on an appeal and cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 22, 2006 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-00680), and an appeal from an order of the same court dated January 5, 2007 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-01802), pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the respondents-appellants' time to serve and file their respective answering briefs, including their points of argument on the cross appeals (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), and to enlarge its time to serve and file a brief in support of its appeal from the order dated January 5, 2007.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the time of the respondents-appellants to serve and file their respective answering briefs, including their points of argument on the cross appeals (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), as well as the time of Classic Construction to serve and file a brief in support of its appeal from the order dated January 5, 2007, is enlarged until October 12, 2007, and the briefs must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court