| Matter of E. (Anonymous), Kayshawn Raheim, a/k/a E. (Ano |
| Motion No: 2007-04616 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 77951(U) |
| Decided on September 13, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M58486
E/sl
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P.
ROBERT A. LIFSON
EDWARD D. CARNI
RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.
|
2007-04616, 2007-04619, 2007-04620, 2007-04623 In the Matter of Kayshawn Raheim E. (Anonymous), a/k/a Kayshawn E. (Anonymous), a/k/a Kayshawn J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, et al., respondents; Tonisha Renee J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha Renea J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tonisha J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha J. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. B-20203-05) In the Matter of Unstanding Joshawn G. (Anonymous), a/k/a Joushawn J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, et al., respondents; Tonisha Renee J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha Renea J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tonisha J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha J. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. B-20204-05) In the Matter of Domonique Daquan E. (Anonymous) a/k/a Domonique E. (Anonymous), a/k/a Domonique J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, et al., respondents; Tonisha Renee J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha Renea J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tonisha J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha J. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. B-20202-05) In the Matter of Shatica Bretnea Versialee G. (Anonymous), a/k/a Shatica G. (Anonymous), a/k/a Shatica J. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, et al., respondents; Tonisha Renee J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha Renea J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tonisha J. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tanisha J. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. B-20205-05)
| DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeals by Tonisha Renee J., a/k/a Tanisha Renea J., a/k/a Tonisha J., a/k/a Tanisha J. from four orders of the Family Court, Kings County, all dated April 17, 2007 (one in each proceeding). By order to show cause dated July 3, 2006, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with scheduling orders all dated May 23, 2007, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeals is denied.
CRANE, J.P., LIFSON, CARNI and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court