| Cordero v Mirecle Cab Corp. |
| Motion No: 2007-00715 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 77997(U) |
| Decided on September 14, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M59581
E/cb
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
PETER B. SKELOS
EDWARD D. CARNI, JJ.
|
2007-00715, 2007-01780 Yanel Cordero, et al., appellants, v Mirecle Cab Corp., etc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 17211/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Separate applications by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 2, 2006, and January 5, 2007, respectively. By order to show cause dated August 2, 2007, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the order dated November 2, 2006, was one denying a motion in limine from which no appeal lies (see Mauro v Village of Freeport, 113 AD2d 876), and the application to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim. By separate order to show cause dated August 2, 2007, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the order dated January 5, 2007, was one denying a motion for leave to renew and reargue a motion in limine from which no appeal lies (see Mauro v Village of Freeport, 113 AD2d 876), and the application to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim.
Upon the applications, and upon the papers filed in support of the motions to dismiss the appeals and the papers filed in opposition and relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motions to dismiss the appeals are held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof; and it is further,
ORDERED that the applications are granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until November 13, 2007, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
CRANE, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SKELOS and CARNI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court