| People v Lebron, Angel D. |
| Motion No: 2005-06740 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 78246(U) |
| Decided on September 17, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M59829
E/sl
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
PETER B. SKELOS
EDWARD D. CARNI, JJ.
|
2005-06740 The People, etc., respondent, v Angel D. Lebron, appellant. (Ind. No. 82/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated June 1, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence. By decision and order on motion dated September 15, 2005, the parties were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated June 1, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738). By affirmation dated November 14, 2005, the attorney assigned to represent the appellant advised the court that the appellant had made a motion pursuant to chapter 643 of the Laws of 2005, to reduce his sentence. That motion was determined by order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated March 22, 2006, and the defendant has taken an appeal therefrom which is pending under Appellate Division Docket No. 2006-10140. By order to show cause dated July 18, 2007, the appellant was directed to show cause before this court why this appeal should or should not be dismissed on the ground that it had been rendered academic by the appeal taken from the order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated March 22, 2006.
Upon the two orders to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal as academic is granted and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion to summarily affirm the order dated June 1, 2005, is denied as academic.
CRANE, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SKELOS and CARNI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court