| Rudman v Rudman |
| Motion No: 2007-02057 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 79553(U) |
| Decided on September 27, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M60519
E/nl
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
PETER B. SKELOS
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2007-02057, 2007-08142 Leslie Rudman, respondent-appellant, v Michael Rudman, appellant-respondent. (Appeal No. 1) Leslie Rudman, respondent, v Michael Rudman, appellant. (Appeal No. 2) (Index No. 200789/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by Michael Rudman to consolidate an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 2, 2007, with an appeal from a judgment of the same court entered August 1, 2007, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated February 2, 2007. Cross motion by Leslie Rudman to hold the motion in abeyance.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals and cross appeal is denied as unnecessary as the appeals and cross appeal may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated February 2, 2007 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-02057), is granted, the appellant-respondent's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until November 27, 2007, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant-respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file her answering brief, including her points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of the court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.
SCHMIDT, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SKELOS and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court