| MARY HERBST AND JEFFREY HERBST, V MARK MARSHALL, . (ACTION NO. 1.) |
| Motion No: CA 06-03403 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2007 NYSlipOp 79877(U) |
| Decided on October 1, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., HURLBUTT, GORSKI, MARTOCHE, AND SMITH, JJ.
DOCKET NO. CA 06-03403
| MARY HERBST AND JEFFREY HERBST, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, V MARK MARSHALL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (ACTION NO. 1.) |
Respondent-appellant having moved to vacate the dismissal of the cross appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Niagara on October 25, 2006, and appellant-respondent having cross-moved for an extension of time to file and serve a reply brief,
Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Leo T. Fabrizi dated November 21, 2007, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, the affirmation of Debra A. Norton dated September 26, 2007, the notice of cross motion with proof of service thereof, the reply affirmation of Leo T. Fabrizi dated September 27, 2007, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion be, and the same hereby is, granted and the brief filed by respondent-appellant shall be considered as both a respondent's brief and an appellant's brief, and
It is further ORDERED that the cross motion be, and the same hereby is, granted on condition that the reply brief is filed and served on or before October 18, 2007, and the Clerk is directed to accept the reply brief for filing, and
It is further ORDERED that surreply briefs, if any, shall be filed and served on or before November 2, 2007.
Entered: October 1, 2007
JoAnn M. Wahl, Clerk