Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M62900

S/sl

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

HOWARD MILLER

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT

STEPHEN G. CRANE

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2007-03357 The People, etc., respondent, v Sheryl Lewis, respondent. (Ind. No. 1280/06)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

The People having appealed from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 12, 2007, and the appeal having been perfected on September 13, 2007, and the defendant having failed to timely file a brief in response thereto, now, in compliance with the requirements of People v Garcia (93 NY2d 42):

THE DEFENDANT IS HEREBY ADVISED

A. that she has the right to the assistance of counsel on the People's appeal;

B. that if she is financially unable to retain counsel he may make an application to this court for the assignment of counsel, and, upon proof of such financial inability, one will be appointed for her;

C. that she has the right to forego the assistance of counsel and to respond to the People's appeal pro se; and

D. that unless within 60 days from the date of this order the defendant either responds to the appeal pro se or by retained counsel, or moves for the appointment of counsel to represent her, she shall be deemed to have waived her right to counsel on the appeal and it shall be heard and determined on the People's brief and record alone; and,

ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION, it is:

ORDERED that the People are directed to serve a copy of this decision and order, together with a copy of their brief and appendix on the appeal, upon the defendant, by personal delivery of the same to her; and it is further,

ORDERED that the People shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this court within 20 days of the date hereof; and it is further,

ORDERED that the defendant's time to respond to the appeal pro se or by retained counsel, or to move for the assignment of counsel, is enlarged until 60 days after the date of service upon her of a copy of this decision and order together with a copy of the brief and appendix on the appeal, and in the event that she fails to so respond to the appeal, or to move for the assignment of counsel within that time, or fails to move for an enlargement of time to respond to the appeal, the defendant shall be deemed to have waived her right to counsel, and the appeal shall be considered and determined only on the People's brief and appendix, and original record; and it is further,

ORDERED that if personal service of a copy of this decision and order cannot be made with due diligence, the People may make ex parte application to this court for an order authorizing alternative methods of service. Such an application shall be supported by affidavit or affidavits detailing the steps taken to find and serve the defendant personally.

PRUDENTI, P.J., MILLER, SCHMIDT, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court