| Pdg Psychological, P.C. a/a/o Ekaterina Tchkadova v State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. |
| Motion No: 2007-01496 QC |
| Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 64061(U) |
| Decided on February 8, 2008 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| PDG PSYCHOLOGICAL, P.C. a/a/o EKATERINA TCHKADOVA, Appellant, -against- STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x PDG PSYCHOLOGICAL, P.C. a/a/o DAWN MILLER, Appellant, -against- GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x IVB MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. a/a/o VINCENT COOKE, Appellant, -against- PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x IVB MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. a/a/o HAROLD SOTO, Appellant, -against- STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x IVB MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. a/a/o ERICSON B. RAMIREZ, Appellant, -against- STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x DELTA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, P.C. a/a/o JEFFERSON ZELON, Appellant, -against- PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x OLEG BARSAY, D.C. a/a/o DORELUS BRADFORD, Appellant, -against- STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x OLEG BARSHAY, D.C., a/a/o GARCELLE LOUIS, Appellant, -against- STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x GPM CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. a/a/o ZULAIKA ROBLES, Appellant, -against- GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x GPM CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. a/a/o MARY MOJICA, Appellant, -against- GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x PDG PSYCHOLOGICAL, P.C. a/a/o MELISSA CHARON, Appellant, -against- PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x DILON MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP. a/a/o DALE LOGAN, Appellant, -against- AMERICAN INDEPENDENT CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x DILON MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP. a/a/o GASTON DANDRADE, Appellant, -against- GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x PDG PSYCHOLOGICAL, P.C. a/a/o PATRICIA SANDINO, Appellant, -against- GEICO INSURANCE CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x CONTEMPORARY ACUPUNCTURE, P.C. a/a/o VICTOR ROBLES, Appellant, -against- NEW YORK CENTRAL MUT. FIRE INS. CO., Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x OMNI CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. a/a/o VICTOR RAMOS, Appellant, -against- NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO., Respondent. |
DECISION
Motion by plaintiffs-appellants to consolidate the above captioned appeals is granted and appeals are dismissed.
Plaintiffs-appellants were not aggrieved by the order imposing sanctions upon their attorney and are not aggrieved by the subsequent order which denied their motion to vacate said order (CPLR 5511; see Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 92 NY2d 944 [1998]; Precise Ct. Reporting v Karten, 6 AD3d 412 [2004]).
Belen, J., taking no part.