| Pankratova v Seleznov |
| Motion No: 2006-03184 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 65300(U) |
| Decided on March 3, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M67101
E/sl
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
WILLIAM E. McCARTHY, JJ.
|
2006-03184, 2006-11207, 2006-11208 Eleonora Pankratova, respondent, v Aleksandr Seleznov, appellant. (Appeal Nos. 1, 2, 3) (Index No. 8006/03) 2007-06649 In the Matter of Alexandr Seleznov, appellant, v Eleonora Pankratova, respondent. (Appeal No. 4) (Docket No. F-32564-06)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 5, 2007, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 26, 2006, an order of the same court dated April 4, 2006, and a money judgment of the same court also dated April 4, 2006, (1) to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this court dated January 31, 2008, as dismissed appeals from the judgment dated January 26, 2006, the order dated April 4, 2006, and the money judgment also dated April 4, 2006, for failure to timely perfect the same, and to reinstate those appeals, (2) to stay enforcement of the judgment dated January 26, 2006, (3) for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel, and to waive the filing fees, and (4) to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.
Upon papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of the judgment dated January 26, 2006, is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to recall and vacate stated portions of the decision and order on motion dated January 31, 2008, and reinstate the appeals from the judgment dated January 26, 2006, the order dated April 4, 2006, and the money judgment also dated April 4, 2006, is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to prosecute the appeals from the judgment dated January 26, 2006, the order dated April 4, 2006, and the money judgment dated April 4, 2006, as a poor person, for the assignment of counsel to prosecute those appeals, to waive the filing fees for those appeals, and to enlarge the time to perfect those appeals are denied as academic; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal from the order dated June 5, 2007, on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for free transcripts in connection with the appeal from the order dated June 5, 2007, to waive the filing fees for that appeal, and for the assignment of counsel to prosecute that appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated June 5, 2007 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-06649), is granted, and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal from that order by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing his brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 7, 2008; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.
MASTRO, J.P., SPOLZINO, ANGIOLILLO and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court