Ruchama Gamiel v Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P.C.

Motion No: 214

Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 66680

Decided on March 18, 2008

Court of Appeals Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law & sect; 431.

This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Ruchama Gamiel, Respondent, v. Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P.C., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.