| Pearlman v Lane |
| Motion No: 2007-05604 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 68916(U) |
| Decided on April 10, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M68840
E/sl
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
STEVEN W. FISHER
HOWARD MILLER
RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.
|
2007-05604, 2007-11598, 2008-00035 Stephen E. Pearlman, appellant, v Kathy Lane, respondent. (Appeal Nos. 1 & 3) Richard S. Weiss, plaintiff, v Pazit Solomon, defendant; Stephen E. Pearlman, appellant; Kathy Lane, respondent. (Appeal No. 2) (Index Nos. 30574/02, 20091/06)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by Stephen E. Pearlman to consolidate appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 12, 2007, and November 9, 2007, with an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 31, 2007, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated April 12, 2007, and to waive the fee for filing this motion.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the fee for filing the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals from the orders dated April 12, 2007, and November 9, 2007, is denied as unnecessary as those appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals from the orders dated April 12, 2007, and November 9, 2007, with the appeal from the order dated October 31, 2007, is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated April 12, 2007 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2007-05604), is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 9, 2008, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FISHER, MILLER and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court