| Matter of Carazo v Carazo |
| Motion No: 2008-05765 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 83859(U) |
| Decided on September 24, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M76246
M/cb
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
WILLIAM E. McCARTHY
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
|
2008-05765 In the Matter of Brigida Carazo, respondent, v Robert Carazo, appellant. (Docket No. F-13398-07)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Robert Carazo from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 15, 2008. By order to show cause dated August 14, 2008, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated July 3, 2008, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until October 27, 2008.
PRUDENTI, P.J., SANTUCCI, McCARTHY and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court