Richard Aiken et v General Electric Company.



Richard Aiken et v General Electric Company.
Motion No: 505023
Slip Opinion No: 2008 NYSlipOp 85059(U)
Decided on September 11, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.



Decided and Entered: September 11, 2008

Case # 505023


RICHARD AIKEN et al.,

Respondents,

v
GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY,

Appellant.


DECISION AND ORDER
ON MOTION

Application for order directing the admission pro hac vice of Emily J. Joselson, Esq., a Vermont attorney, pursuant to section 520.11 (a) (1) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted, without costs, and Emily J. Joselson, Esq., is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of representing respondents upon the appeal.
CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, CARPINELLO, ROSE and KANE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:



Michael J. Novack
Clerk of the Court