| Thomas J. Lucas d/b/a Star Tax Reduction Consultant v Gus Xikis |
| Motion No: 2008-02175 NC |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NYSlipOp 68923(U) |
| Decided on April 1, 2009 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- GUS XIKIS, Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- ANGELA FERRIOLD, Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- NOREEN YOUSDAF and NASIM CHAUDHARY, Respondents. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- DHANWANTIE RAMNARINE, Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- BARBARA McHEFFEY ATKINSON, Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- DOUGLAS STENNENT, Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x THOMAS J. LUCAS d/b/a STAR TAX REDUCTION CONSULTANT, Appellant, -against- CHARLES McCLENDON and MARIE McCLENDON, Respondents. |
DECISION
That branch of the motion by appellant to consolidate the above captioned appeals is granted and the appeals are consolidated under appeal number 2008-2164 N C.
That branch of the motion for a preference is denied.
On the court's own motion, an enlargement of time to perfect appeal is granted and appeal shall be perfected by June 5, 2009.
Ordered that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before June 5, 2009, the court on its own motion, may dismiss the appeal, or the respondents may apply to dismiss the appeal on three days' notice, and may serve such application in person.