| Matter of Escamez v Walker |
| Motion No: 2008-10875 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 72377(U) |
| Decided on May 13, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M86536
M/cb
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, J.P.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
|
2008-10875 In the Matter of Stacey A. Escamez, respondent, v Ian Walker, appellant. (Docket No. V-03645-05)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Ian Walker from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 4, 2008. By order to show cause dated April 17, 2009, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered relieving the attorney assigned by order on certification dated February 23, 2009, to perfect the appeal on behalf of the appellant on the ground that the attorney has been unable to contact the appellant, and dismissing the appeal.
On the court's own motion, and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the assigned counsel is relieved of the assignment; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
SPOLZINO, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court