| Matter of Matis v Barkman |
| Motion No: 2009-02399 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 72799(U) |
| Decided on May 19, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M86777
M/cb
|
2009-02399, 2009-03447
In the Matter of Ephraim Matis, appellant, v Navah Barkman, respondent. (Docket No. F-10437-06)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Appeals by Ephraim Matis from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 26, 2009, and an amended order dated April 2, 2009. By scheduling order dated April 7, 2009, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal from the order dated February 26, 2009; or
(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts were received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts were not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that they were ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcripts were expected; or
(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.
The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated April 9, 2009, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before June 2, 2009; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the parties or their attorneys by regular mail.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court