| People v Mendez, Winston, a/k/a Thomas, Richard |
| Motion No: 2001-07602 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 75536(U) |
| Decided on June 18, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M88201
E/sl
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
RUTH C. BALKIN
ARIEL E. BELEN, JJ.
|
2001-07602, 2006-07573 The People, etc., respondent, v Winston Mendez, a/k/a Richard Thomas, appellant. (Ind. No. 1791/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 19, 2001, and an order of the same court dated March 30, 2005, for leave to prosecute the appeal from the order as a poor person and the assignment of counsel. By order to show cause dated May 12, 2009, the appellant was directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals on the ground that he had abandoned the appeals, and the appellant's motion was held in abeyance in the interim.
Upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellant's motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appeal from the order dated March 30, 2005 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2006-07573), is dismissed, on the ground that it has been rendered academic by the resentence imposed December 19, 2008; an appeal from the resentence is pending under Appellate Division Docket No. 2009-03826; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order dated March 30, 2005, and the branches of the appellant's motion which are for leave to prosecute the appeal from the order dated March 30, 2005, as a poor person and the assignment of counsel are denied as academic; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the judgment rendered July 19, 2001 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2001-07602), is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the appellant's motion which are for leave to prosecute the appeal from the judgment rendered July 19, 2001, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel are denied, with leave to renew on or before July 23, 2009, upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the appellant's full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income and expenses.
SKELOS, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and BELEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court