| Paez v Shah |
| Motion No: 2009-01901 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 77985(U) |
| Decided on July 15, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M89055
E/sl
|
2009-01901
Eric Paez, respondent-appellant, v Hemal Shah, appellant-respondent, Surrendra Shah, respondent. (Index No. 1184-06)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Separate applications by the appellant-respondent and the respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 29, 2008.
ORDERED that the applications are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant-respondent's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until October 8, 2009, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court