| Matter of Stevens v Lipscomb |
| Motion No: 2009-06414 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 82214(U) |
| Decided on September 2, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M91514
E/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
HOWARD MILLER
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
|
2009-06414, 2009-06415 In the Matter of Rayford Stevens, appellant, v Danette Lipscomb, respondent. (Docket No. V-121/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated June 4, 2009, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act § 1116), and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive the filing fee, for free transcripts, and for the assignment of counsel are denied.
SANTUCCI, J.P., MILLER, BALKIN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court