| Wells Fargo Bank, n.a.a./tfor Option One Bank Mn, Nat Assoc. a/t w/o Rec v Amended Decision Gordon Edward Dukes a/k/a Gordon E. Dukes |
| Motion No: 2009-01646 SC |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 86382(U) |
| Decided on October 13, 2009 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
APPELLATE TERM : 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
| WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.A./TFOR OPTION ONE BANK MN, NAT ASSOC. A/T W/O REC, Respondent, -against-AMENDED DECISION GORDON EDWARD DUKES a/k/a GORDON E. DUKES, Respondent, -and- DONNA DUKES, Appellant. |
DECISION
Motion by tenant-appellant to stay all proceedings pending hearing and determination of the appeal is denied without prejudice to appellant moving for relief pursuant to CPLR 5519 (a) (6) in the DISTRICT COURT.
Tenant has shown arguable merit that by her filing for bankruptcy, the subsequent foreclosure sale was stayed (see Yen-Ching Chen v Dickerson, 17 Misc 3d 61[App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007]).