| People v Ackies, Carey; Blackman, Rasheem |
| Motion No: 2009-03020 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 88468(U) |
| Decided on November 12, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M94301
S/sl
STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P.
JOSEPH COVELLO
FRED T. SANTUCCI
RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.
|
2009-03020, 2009-03023, 2009-03984, 2009-03986, 2009-03987, 2009-03988, 2009-03989, 2009-03990, 2009-03991, 2009-03992 The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Rasheem Blackman, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Rayvon Folk, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Isiah Sadler, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Nora Hunter, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Leslie McFarland, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Jameke Howard, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Jaquan Crawford, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Sherron Bullock, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Sandy Figueroa, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v Carey Ackies, defendant; Tyriek Hankins, respondent. (Ind. No. 10116/07)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated November 5, 2009, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:
Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to serve a redacted brief and appendix on appeals from 10 orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all dated February 24, 2009.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appellant may redact any information from its brief and appendix which would identify either the undercover officers or the confidential informants involved in the drug transactions at issue, without prejudice to the respondents moving to strike any redactions made; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to serve the redacted brief and appendix, as indicated above, and file the unredacted brief and appendix with the court is enlarged until December 7, 2009.
FISHER, J.P., COVELLO, SANTUCCI and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court