| Matter of Verhulst v Putnam |
| Motion No: 2009-08636 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2009 NY Slip Op 91726(U) |
| Decided on December 17, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M96109
M/cb
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
PLUMMER E. LOTT
SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.
|
2009-08636 In the Matter of Michael G. Verhulst, respondent, v Amanda Putnam, appellant. (Docket No. V-00916-09
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Amanda Putnam from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 10, 2009. By order to show cause dated November 5, 2009, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated September 17, 2009, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2). Application by the appellant to withdraw the appeal.
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the application is granted, and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
RIVERA, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, LOTT and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court