| Matter of Stiso v Stiso |
| Motion No: 2009-09029 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 66214(U) |
| Decided on March 22, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M99958
M/ct
JOSEPH COVELLO, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
RANDALL T. ENG
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
|
2009-09029 In the Matter of Thomas Stiso, respondent, v Linda Stiso, appellant. (Docket No. V-03019-08)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Linda Stiso from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated August 21, 2009. By order to show cause dated January 27, 2010, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated December 10, 2009, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2).
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 12, 2010.
COVELLO, J.P., FLORIO, ENG and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court