| Matter of Spelman v Spelman |
| Motion No: 2009-10439 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 67122(U) |
| Decided on March 31, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M100690
E/sl
JOSEPH COVELLO, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ.
|
2009-10439 In the Matter of Nina Spelman, appellant, v Kim Spelman, respondent. (Docket No. F-00098-94)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated September 30, 2009, as a poor person.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act § 1116), and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the appellant's motion which are to waive the filing fee and for free transcripts are denied.
COVELLO, J.P., SANTUCCI, ANGIOLILLO and DICKERSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court