PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, GREEN, PINE, AND GORSKI, JJ.

MOTION NOS. 1458-1461/09
DOCKET NOS. CA 08-02265, CA 08-02266, CA 09-00002, AND CA 09-00001
DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304 HIAWATHA
BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE
DOCKET NOS. CA 08-02265, CA 08-02266, CA 09-00002, AND CA 09-00001
IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304
HIAWATHA BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE CITY OF
IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304
HIAWATHA BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE CITY OF
DOCKET NOS. CA 08-02265, CA 08-02266, CA 09-00002, AND CA 09-00001
IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304
HIAWATHA BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE CITY OF
IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304
HIAWATHA BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE CITY OF
DOCKET NOS. CA 08-02265, CA 08-02266, CA 09-00002, AND CA 09-00001
IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304
HIAWATHA BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE CITY
IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER DRIVE (LOT 11K), SBL NO. 114-02-05.6; 304
HIAWATHA BOULEVARD W. REAR (LOT 11B), SBL NO. 114-02-05.2 IN THE CITY OF

LT PROPCO, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 2.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———— IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY IDENTIFIED AS 1 CAROUSEL CENTER CITY OF SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. ——————————————————————& mdash;———— LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 1.) (APPEAL NO. 1.) LT PROPCO, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) MARCH 19, 2010 PAGE 2 ——————————————————————& mdash;———— LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 2.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———— KAUFMANN'S CAROUSEL, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 3.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———— IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. ——————————————————————& mdash;———— LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 1.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———- IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. ——————————————————————& mdash;———— KAUFMANN'S CAROUSEL, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 2.) MARCH 19, 2010 PAGE 3 LT PROPCO, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———— LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 2.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———— KAUFMANN'S CAROUSEL, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P. AND CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 3.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———— IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. ——————————————————————& mdash;———— LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 1.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———- IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. MARCH 19, 2010 PAGE 4 ——————————————————————& mdash;———— KAUFMANN'S CAROUSEL, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 3.) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY OF SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. ——————————————————————& mdash;———- LORD & TAYLOR CAROUSEL, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 1.) ——————————————————————& mdash;———- IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE CAROUSEL CENTER SITE, WHICH SITE IS GENERALLY SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, WHICH PARCELS COMPRISE A PORTION OF THE SITE FOR THE PHASED PUBLIC PROJECT KNOWN AS DESTINY USA. ——————————————————————& mdash;———— KAUFMANN'S CAROUSEL CENTER, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (PROCEEDING NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 4.)

Plaintiff-appellants LT Propco, LLC and Kaufmann's Carousel, Inc. having moved for reargument of or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this Court entered December 30, 2009,

Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Douglas A. Foss dated February 4, 2010, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, the opposing affirmation of Kevin G. Roe dated February 24, 2010, the opposing affirmation of Mark R. McNamara dated February 25, 2010, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.

Entered: March 19, 2010

Patricia L. Morgan, Clerk