| Feustel v Feustel |
| Motion No: 2010-06617 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 78664(U) |
| Decided on August 3, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M106534
S/sl
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2010-06617 Desiree Feustel, respondent, v Richard Feustel, appellant. (Index No. 06-14488)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Richard Feustel from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 13, 2010.
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from so much of the order as denied reargument, and so much of the order as directed a hearing on the remaining issues is not appealable as of right and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Bagdy v Progresso Foods Corp., 86 AD2d 589).
PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SKELOS and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court